This real-life Spider-Man, seen on a Vineyard Wind turbine blade, is Tyler Paton. Tyler is an independent composite specialist who inspects and repairs blades on site. The Nantucket Current shared these images on X.
Posts Tagged ‘Offshore Wind’
Spider-Man?
Posted in accidents, Offshore Wind, tagged GE Vernova, Haliade-X, Nantucket Current, Offshore Wind, Spider-Man, turbine blade failure, Tyler Paton, Vineyard Wind on August 27, 2024| Leave a Comment »
US Offshore wind: from irrational exuberance to economic reality
Posted in energy policy, Offshore Wind, tagged Atlantic wind, decline in bidding, irrational exuberance, Offshore Wind on August 20, 2024| 1 Comment »
In the wake of last week’s lackluster Atlantic wind lease auction (summarized above), an excellent Renewable Energy World article documents the sharp decline in participation and bidding since the massive February 2022 sale of 6 leases offshore NY and NJ. That sale garnered bids ranging from $285 million to an astounding $1.1 billion, with total high bids of $4.37 billion! The sale was touted as the “nation’s highest grossing competitive energy lease sale in history.” The extravagant bidding, which made little sense then, seems downright irrational now.
Even the December 2022 California offshore lease sale, where development will be dependent on more expensive floating turbines, attracted substantially higher bids for leases (5) smaller than those auctioned last week.
The highly promoted Gulf of Mexico wind auctions were busts with the first sale receiving only one bid for $6.5 million and the second being cancelled due to lack of interest.
Major oil companies like bp and Shell seem to have exited the market for new US offshore wind leases. That leaves Equinor (2/3 Norwegian govt ownership) as the only major oil company pursuing US offshore wind leases.
In just 2 years, cost increases, coastal resident opposition, a troubling blade failure, and developer uncertainty have dramatically changed the outlook for US offshore wind. Nonetheless, the Administration’s wind advocates continue to sing from the same song sheet:
“Today’s lease sale reflects the forward momentum we are seeing to power millions of American homes with clean energy and create good-paying, climate jobs,” said White House National Climate Advisor Ali Zaidi. “With nine commercial-scale projects approved in the last three years and more to go, we are using every available tool to grow the American offshore wind industry as we strengthen the nation’s power grid and tackle the climate crisis.”
Quality control is a big challenge for wind turbine manufacturers
Posted in accidents, energy policy, Offshore Wind, Regulation, tagged BOEM, GE Vernova, Norway, Offshore Wind, quality control, safety culture, Siemens Gamesa, turbine blade failure, Vestas, Vineyard Wind on August 8, 2024| 1 Comment »
As the above examples illustrate, turbine blade failures, like the Vineyard Wind incident near Nantucket, are not unique to GE Vernova. GE’s rivals, Siemens Gamesa and Vestas, have also experienced serious quality control issues.
Per ReviewEconomy (2023), “Unexpected and increasing wind turbine failure rates, largely in newer and bigger models, are savaging the profits of some of the world’s biggest manufacturers, as Siemens Gamesa, GE and Vestas report heavy repair and maintenance losses.”
All 3 manufacturers will be providing turbines for US Atlantic wind development. The table below lists the manufacturers for active projects with approved Records of Decision (RODs).
In light of the manufacturing challenges, all 3 companies report increased emphasis on quality control. Why has quality control to date been inadequate and how will the past problems be corrected?
Has the wind industry’s sense of entitlement, as evidenced in their tax credit, rate increase, and departure expectations, affected their safety and quality culture? Has industry and governmental wind energy promotion rushed development and compromised design and fabrication decisions? It’s time for wind developers, manufacturers, and regulators to make sure their priorities are in order.
| project | turbine towers | manufacturer |
| Coastal VA Offshore Wind | 202 | Siemens Gamesa |
| Revolution Wind | 100 | Siemens Gamesa |
| Sunrise Wind | 94 | Siemens Gamesa |
| Atlantic Shores South | 200 | Vestas |
| Ocean Wind 1 | 98 | GE Vernova |
| Vineyard Wind 1 | 100 | GE Vernova |
| Empire Wind 1 & 2 | 147 | Vestas |
| New England Wind (phases 1&2) | 150 | Vestas |
Gulf of Mexico wind: Undaunted by leasing failures, BOEM presses on
Posted in energy policy, Gulf of Mexico, Offshore Wind, tagged 2023 wind sale, 5 year leasing plan, BOEM, Gulf of Mexico, Hercate, OCS oil and gas leasing, OCSLA, Offshore Wind, unsolicited lease request on July 29, 2024| Leave a Comment »
GoM wind leasing update:
- BOEM’s highly promoted 2023 GoM wind sale was a bust. The sole bidder, the German company RWE, acquired a single lease.
- BOEM’s second GoM wind sale failed to get off the ground. Because only one company expressed interest in participating, that sale has been cancelled.
- BOEM is now surveying interest in other GoM areas as a result of an unsolicited lease request from Hercate Energy.
- If BOEM does not receive competing indications of interest, they may (and probably will) issue a noncompetitive lease to Hecate.
- BOEM calls Hercate an “industry leader.” However, per their website, Hecate is mainly a solar energy company with only 2 wind projects. Both of those wind projects are onshore (Kentucky), and are “in development” (i.e. not yet operating). Hercate is no doubt a fine company, but have they demonstrated the technical expertise and financial strength needed for offshore wind development?
BOEM’s aggressive wind leasing policy stands in stark contrast to their current oil and gas policy. Not a single oil and gas sale will be held in 2024. Were it not for a provision in the “Inflation Reduction Act,” the last 3 GoM sales (257, 259, and 261) would probably not have occurred.
The new 5 year oil and gas leasing plan confirms that the Dept. of the Interior (DOI) has no intention of fulfilling their statutory oil and gas leasing mandate. In announcing the new 5 year plan, DOI boasted that the plan includes the fewest sales (3) of any plan in the history of the program. DOI strongly implied that the only reason those 3 sales were included was to sustain the wind program.,
When we drafted the OCSLA amendments that authorize offshore wind leasing, we envisioned complementary and synergistic programs, not a dogmatic pro-wind bias. As experts like Daniel Yergin have repeatedly warned, the notion that wind energy can eliminate the need for oil and gas is pure folly.
Offshore wind: New Bedford Light examines the glauconite challenge
Posted in decommissioning, Offshore Wind, tagged decommissioning, financial assurance, glaucomite, Offshore Wind, turbine foundations on May 22, 2024| 1 Comment »
Anastasia Lennon has published several informative articles in the New Bedford Light on the challenges posed by the presence of glauconite on North Atlantic wind leases. The above illustrations explain those challenges and identify where glauconite has been found to date. Per her latest article:
Preliminary geotechnical analysis for New England Wind, an Avangrid project, showed a risk of turbine pile foundation refusal in 50 of nearly 130 turbine locations, or about 40%, according to 2023 records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
The mineral’s behavior poses a “significant risk” to offshore wind development, said BOEM, the federal regulator of offshore wind, in a paper last year.
The potential for foundation problems associated with glauconite and other geotechnical factors are among the reasons why decommissioning financial assurance should be demonstrated in full when turbines and other facilities are installed, not years later.
Climate change is happening today! 😉
Posted in climate, energy policy, Gulf of Mexico, Offshore Energy - General, Wind Energy, tagged climate change, deniers, Offshore Wind, solar eclipse, Texas on April 8, 2024| Leave a Comment »
… and you deniers are fully responsible. There’s a reason why Texas is the most affected state 😉
But fear not, we will line our shores with wind turbines, restrict offshore oil and gas leasing, and subsidize carbon disposal in the Gulf of Mexico. All of this “help” will have a negligible effect on the climate, which will continue to change as it always has and always will.
A US offshore wind lease may NOT be issued after 12/20/2024 unless an oil and gas lease sale is held prior to that date.
Posted in energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, Offshore Wind, Regulation, tagged 5 year leasing plan, Inflation Reduction Act, offshore oil and gas, Offshore Wind on March 12, 2024| 2 Comments »
(2) the Secretary may not issue a lease for offshore wind development under section 8(p)(1)(C) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C.1337(p)(1)(C)) unless—
‘‘Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,” p. 646
(A) an offshore lease sale has been held during the 1-year period ending on the date of the issuance of the lease for offshore wind development; and (B) the sum total of acres offered for lease in offshore lease sales during the 1-year period ending on the date of the issuance of the lease for offshore wind development is not less than 60,000,000 acres.
Lease Sale 261 was held on 12/20/23. Absent legislative action, no wind leases may be issued after 12/20/24 unless another oil and gas lease sale is held prior to that date. Given that the minimalist 5 year oil and gas leasing plan, which is being challenged, does not propose a sale until 2025, wind lease issuance will likely be suspended at the end of the year. (Note: I wonder if the legislative restriction also applies to lease assignments from existing owners to new owners? Probably not, but that would be very significant given the current state of the offshore wind industry.)
The legislative restriction may be a partial explanation for the apparent rush to issue wind leases. 16 new wind leases were issued in 2022 and 2023, bringing the total number of active leases to 36. The philosophy seems to be this: issue as many leases as you can, as fast as you can, wherever you can (ala James Watt’s failed strategy for the oil and gas program.) Coastal residents are not entirely thrilled.
Perhaps the wind program should be required to develop 5 year leasing plans, as is the case for the oil and gas program. This might facilitate a more holistic approach to wind energy development and ease concerns about cumulative impacts.
BOEM/NOAA Right Whale and Offshore Wind Strategy (January 2024)
Posted in energy policy, Offshore Wind, tagged BOEM, NASEM, NOAA, Offshore Wind, Rice's whale, RIght Whale, strategy on January 29, 2024| 2 Comments »
Key takeaways after reviewing the BOEM/NOAA strategy document:
- The document effectively summarizes the dire state of the North Atlantic Right Whale.
- The BOEM/NOAA strategy is to monitor and further assess the impacts.
- The need for mitigation will be determined through collaborative processes.
- This industry-friendly strategy contrasts sharply with the restrictive operating requirements proposed for the more speculative Rice’s whale expanded area in the Gulf of Mexico.
NARW status (pages 7-14):
- Roughly 237 NARWs have died since the population peaked at 481 in 2011, exceeding the potential biological removal (PBR) level on average by more than 40 times for the past 5 years (Pace III et al. 2021).
- Human-caused mortality is so high that no adult NARW has been confirmed to have died from natural causes in several decades (Hayes et al. 2023).
- Most NARWs have a low probability of surviving past 40 years even though the NARW can live up to a century.
- There were no first-time mothers in 2022.
- About 42% of the population is known to be in reduced health (Hamilton et al. 2021)
- A NASEM study confirmed that offshore wind has the potential to alter local and regional hydrodynamics
- “Effects to NARWs could result from stressors generated from a single project; there is potential for these effects to be compounded by exposure to multiple projects.” (p. 14)
BOEM/NOAA strategy:
- No new mitigation is recommended pending further study.
- “BOEM and NOAA Fisheries will work together alongside our partners (including the OSW industry) to further develop the information and science the agencies will use to inform their decisions to responsibly develop OSW while protecting and recovering NARWs.” (Comment: While regulator-industry collaboration is essential for effective offshore development, be it wind or oil and gas, regulators and operating companies have distinctly different missions and responsibilities and should not be viewed as partners.)
- (p. 15): “As the OSW industry continues to grow and as projects begin construction, BOEM and NOAA Fisheries will continue to work with our partners to evaluate existing strategies and to further collect and apply newly available information to inform future decisions. This Strategy is an integral step to organize BOEM, NOAA Fisheries, and their partners around a shared vision and clear path to effectively study and manage this issue moving forward.” (???)
- (p.17): BOEM will “attempt to avoid issuing new leases in areas that may impact potential high-value habitat and/or high use areas for important life history functions such as NARW foraging, migrating, mating, or calving. For areas that are leased, permitting activities should minimize any known or potential threat to NARWs and their habitats, and developers and BOEM should support research and monitoring.”
Questions:
- How are the NARW threats identified in the NASEM study being mitigated?
- What is the status of the Nantucket Shoals conservation buffer zone recommended by NOAA (see the May 2022 letter attached to linked post)?
- Why are the Rice’s whale litigants okay with the more compelling threat to the NARW?
- What happens if the hydrodynamic threats identified by the NASEM panel are confirmed?
- Why isn’t this collaborative approach being pursued in assessing and mitigating risks to the Rice’s whale?
- Can we expect the Federal government’s leading offshore wind promoter to impose restrictions that further weaken the economics of offshore wind development?
Pictured below: density of NARWs near wind leases and hydrodynamic effects of turbines
Floating turbine maintenance and California offshore wind development
Posted in California, decommissioning, Norway, Offshore Energy - General, Offshore Wind, UK, tagged California, decommissioning, Equinor, floating turbines, Hywind, Morro Bay, Offshore Wind on January 22, 2024| 1 Comment »
It’s prudent, if not imperative, to tow floating wind turbines to sheltered coastal locations for major maintenance. For that reason, Hywind, the world’s first floating wind farm will be offline for up to 4 months this summer.
Hywind Scotland‘s operator, Norwegian power giant Equinor, says that operational data has indicated that its wind turbines need work. The pilot project has been in operation since 2017.
The five Siemens Gamesa turbines will be towed to Norway this summer. An Equinor spokesperson said, “This is the first such operation for a floating farm, and the safest method to do this is to tow the turbines to shore and execute the operations in sheltered conditions.”
electrek
Published data indicate that Hywind has been the UK’s best performing offshore wind farm. Performance data for Hywind, and a chart illustrating the capacity factors since commissioning, are posted below. The 2024 capacity factor will, of course, be substantially reduced as a result of the essential offsite maintenance.
| rolling 12 month capacity factor ending 5/2022 | life capacity factor | age (years) | installed capacity (MWp) | total elec generated (GWh) | power/ unit area spanned (W/m2) | |
| Hywind Scotland | 49.5% | 52.6% | 4.6 | 30 | 642 | 1.0 |
The first US floating turbines are expected to be at these California offshore leases, and Hywind operator Equinor is one of the lessees:
Given the financial challenges facing the offshore wind industry, the still emerging technology, and the risks inherent in California offshore development, the amounts bid on these leases only 13 months ago are stunning.
Some Central Coast residents are not enamoured with “another attempt to industrialize the coast.” Although the turbines will be >20 miles offshore, they will have to be towed to shore for major maintenance. For the Central California leases, nearby harbor areas like Morro Bay (pictured below) would be overwhelmed by the large structures and the maintenance and repair operations. Towing the towers to LA/Long Beach, albeit rather distant from the leases, would seem to be the preferred option for such work.
Ironically, a report for BOEM, points to synergies between the offshore wind industry and oil and gas decommissioning industry. Such synergies will only be possible if longstanding oil and gas decommissioning obstacles are satisfactorily addressed and the offshore wind projects proceed as planned.
Which will come first – platform decommissioning or wind turbine commissioning? For those young enough to find out, what is the over-under for the years until (1) half of those platforms are decommissioned, and (2) half of the wind turbines commissioned? Any number <10 is unrealistic for either.
Perhaps a bit less offshore wind hyperbole would be prudent
Posted in energy policy, Offshore Wind, Regulation, tagged BOEM, hyperbole, Offshore Wind on December 11, 2023| 1 Comment »
BOEM diminishes the credibility of their important (and generally excellent) scientific, lease administration, and regulatory work with over-the-top wind energy promotion. The tweet below is a recent example.
This is not a good look for the bureau that is expected to objectively evaluate offshore wind projects. Leave the hype to the wind industry and its NGO supporters.
