Feeds:
Posts
Comments

On Friday, California Superior Court Judge Donna Geck upheld the restraining order that blocks Sable Offshore from restarting Santa Ynez Unit production. She scheduled a followup court hearing for June 27. Meanwhile, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s hearing on PHMSA’s assertion of Federal jurisdiction over the onshore pipeline segments is scheduled for July.

Can Sable survive financially until those hearings are concluded?

Contradictorily, we learn that FourWorld Capital Management just purchased 8 million shares of Sable. Is that the financial equivalent of Pickett’s Charge or does FourWorld have good reasons for their optimism?

Prior Sable Santa Ynez Unit posts.

Argus reports that Israel’s energy ministry has instructed Chevron and Energean to suspend production at their offshore Leviathan and Karish gas fields.

Although, the Israeli facility shut-ins will result in the curtailment of exports, Egypt has implemented a backup plan to ensure adequate supply.

There is no indication that Chevron’s Tamar field has been shut-in.

Summary table:

field
(operator)
2024 production
(billion cubic meters)
(% of Israel’s total)
June 2025 conflict2026 conflict
Leviathan
(Chevron)
11.33
45%
shut-inshut-in
Tamar
(Chevron)
10.09
37%
producingproducing?
Karish
(Evergean)
5.96
18%
shut-inshut-in

December 2025 Gulf oil production had to average 1.993 million bopd for 2025 to match the 2019 record. It exceeded that mark by 0.003 million bopd. However, October and November production were revised slightly downward resulting in a near dead heat annual average.

A closer look at the numbers (table below) shows that 2025 edged 2019 by a mere 250 bopd. Amazing!

Major caveat: The Nov and Dec 2025 figures will likely be revised slightly when EIA releases the next update at the end of January. Fingers crossed!😀

Top 3 Yearsave. daily production (1000’s of barrels)
20251897.67
20191897.42
20231864

The Hot Rock Act (attached) would authorize a large grant program for superhot, ultradeep geothermal energy research and development. Here is the gist of the bill:

  • $16 million/yr (2027-2031) for high temperature completions. equipment, and supercritical fluids research and development.
  • $40 million/yr (2027-2031) for a test site.
  • $16 million/yr (2027-2031) for hot dry rock geothermal systems research and development.
  • $30 million/yr (2027-2031) for achieving program milestones.
  • $5 million/yr (2027-2031) to study the risks associated with hot dry rock geothermal energy.
  • $10 million/yr (2027-2031) for geothermal industry workforce training.
  • $10 million/yr to support BLM and Forest Service authorization programs for hot dry geothermal.

That’s a total of $127 million/yr for the next 5 years. Is this necessary?

Press reports indicate that Quaise is raising $200 million to develop its first commercial geothermal power plant. If superhot geothermal is as promising as many of us believe, companies should be able to attract sufficient private capital without financial support from the Federal govt.

John Smith has shared the Environmental Assessment (attached) associated with PHMSA’s Special Permit for segments 324 and 325 of Sable’s Santa Ynez Unit (SYU) pipeline system. The document is an interesting read for those following Sable’s attempt to restart production from the SYU.

PHMSA’s public notice (attached) is required because Sable’s Emergency Special Permit expired on 21 FEB. Comments are due by 26 MAR. More background.

PHMSA is publishing this notice to solicit public comments on a request for a special permit submitted by Sable Offshore Corp. (Sable). Sable is seeking relief from compliance with certain requirements in the Federal pipeline safety regulations. PHMSA has proposed conditions to ensure that the special permit is not inconsistent with pipeline safety. At the conclusion of the 30-day comment period, PHMSA will review the comments received from this notice as part of its evaluation to grant or deny the special permit request.

The natural gas revolution is cause for celebration! How about a parade down Constitution Ave?😉

In light of the Dept. of Energy’s announcement commemorating the 10th anniversary of the first export cargo of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG), I’m linking a 16 year old BOE post asking why we weren’t celebrating the emerging natural gas bonanza. Keep in mind that 20 years ago we were planning for LNG import facilities in the Gulf!

Quote from DOE about the transformation of the US into the world’s leading LNG exporter:

“This transformation was made possible by the Shale Revolution, an era of breakthrough technologies including horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing that unlocked vast domestic oil and natural gas resources.”

The “Natural Gas Revolution” (Yergin) is an important part of our history that deserves national attention.

DOE graphic
Natural Gas for the win!

Tyra gas hub, North Sea, Danish sector

Excerpts from Argus article:

The Danish government will “initiate a process” to look at possibly extending one or more production licences in the Danish North Sea until 2050, to contribute to European energy security and independence, it said.

The government has asked the Danish underground consortium (DUC) — which operates the Tyra hub — to “explore an extension” beyond the current 2042 expiry.

Europe is in dire need of energy independence, and while renewables expansion can help the bloc achieve that goal, natural gas will still play a significant part of the energy mix in the coming year, the Danish government said. “Europe must stand on its own two feet,” Danish industry and trade minister Mortern Bodskov said

Attached are proposed revisions to BOEM’s marine minerals regulations as published today in the Federal Register. As advertised, the revisions appear to be largely administrative in nature and do not substantively change the marine minerals program.

The proposal does require BOEM to act on unsolicited lease sale requests within 28 days (currently 45 days), which may prove to be a challenge. See the excerpt pasted below.

G. Revise 30 CFR 581.11(b) “Unsolicited request for a lease sale”

The requirement for the BOEM Director to decide “within 45 days” of receipt of a lease request is not based on a statutory requirement. BOEM proposes to replace this 45-day timeframe with 28 days to ensure timely processing of such requests.

The wave data are from Georges Bank (buoy 44011, first chart) and Nantucket Shoals (buoy 44008, second chart).

Note that the significant wave height is the average height from trough to crest of the highest one-third of waves that occur in a given period.