Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘tract evaluation’

Companies seeking to acquire OCS leases are not only competing with each other, they are also competing with BOEM’s tract evaluations. In that regard, the bidders fared well at Sale BBG1. Only 3 of the 181 high bids were rejected by BOEM. and those rejections appear to be warranted.

The rejected bids were significantly below both BOEM’s Mean of the Range-of-Value and Lower Bound Confidence Interval for these single bid tracts (table below).

Block No.Companyno. of bidsbidMROVLBCI
EW 921LLOG1$505,777$2,900,000$2,200,000
MC 587KUSA1$700,000 $3,300,000$2,200,000
MC 588LLOG1$613,008$6,100,000$4,600,000
MROV=Mean of the Range-of-Value; LBCI=Lower Bound Confidence Interval; KUSA=Karoon (Australia) Energy USA; EW=Ewing Bank; MC=Mississippi Canyon

LLOG submitted 9 other high bids (alone or with partners) that were accepted. KUSA did not submit any other bids. We’ll see if the rejected bids for these blocks are exceeded in future sales.

Nine other high bids (table below) were less than the MROV, but all were greater than the LBCI. Those bidders “beat the house,” acquiring leases for <MROV. In that regard, Equinor led the pack with no rejections even though 3 of their 7 bids were below MROV. Similarly, 2 of Beacon’s 4 bids were <MROV, with no rejections.

Block No.Companyno. of bidsbidMROVLBCI
GC 345Beacon1$5,302,358$5,400,000$4,200,000
GC 346Beacon1$1,102,358$1,500,000$900,000
GC 547Equinor1$3,200,067$4,500,000$2,600,000
GC 549Equinor1$899,967$1,500,000$576,000
AT 64LLOG1$7,997,018$8,300,000$6,700.000
KC 386Oxy2$3,000,505$3,500,000$2,800,000
KC 429Oxy1$600,505$910,000$470,000
KC 431Woodside1$904,547$1,200,000$840,000
WR 56Equinor1$904,547$1,200,000$576,000
MROV=Mean of the Range-of-Value; LBCI=Lower Bound Confidence Interval; AT=Atwater Valley, GC=Green Canyon, KC=Keathley Canyon, WR=Walker Ridge

Perhaps most interesting were the blocks that were highly valued by industry, but not by BOEM. Each of these blocks (table below) received multiple bids and high bids >$10 million. Conversely, BOEM valued the blocks at only $576,000, which (per the terms of the sale) equates to the minimum acceptable bid of $100/acre.

Block No.high bidderhigh bidother bidsMROV
GC 845Beacon$11,802,358LLOG: $613,008$576,000
KC 25Chevron$18,592,086BP: $11,507,770
Shell: $753,029
$576,000
WR 443Woodside$15,204,547Chevron $1,596,189$576,000
WR444Woodside$12,204,547BP: $4,593,770
Chevron $1,482,378
$576,000
MROV=Mean of the Range-of-Value; LBCI=Lower Bound Confidence Interval; GC=Green Canyon, KC=Keathley Canyon, WR=Walker Ridge


All of this demonstrates yet again that:

  • the govt is leasing exploration and development opportunities, not confirmed resources,
  • commercial discoveries are far from certain,
  • informed assessments differ (I.e. great minds, and their computers, don’t always think alike πŸ˜€),
  • corporate priorities differ, and
  • exploration strategies evolve.

Superstition, tactic, AI, coded or subliminal message? πŸ˜‰

  • All 58 BP bids end with 770. Examples: $1,707,770 and $807,770. (At Sale BBG2, all 5 BP bids ended with 990.)
  • All 18 Shell bids ended with 029. (At Sale BBG2, all 6 Shell bids ended with 240.)
  • 13 of 15 Anadarko bids ended with 505, the other 2 ended with 101.
  • All 9 Woodside bids ended with 547.
  • All 3 Eni bids ended with 001.
  • All 4 Arena bids ended with 912.
  • All 12 Talos bids ended with 986.
  • All 3 Beacon bids ended with 358.

Read Full Post »

Tracts receiving bids in Sale BBG1

To date,BOEM has deemed 96 of the 181 BBG1 high bids to be acceptable. No high bids have been rejected. Although the sale was “beautiful but not big,” the bids were relatively strong on a per acre basis. The number of rejected bids may thus be quite low.

No bids were accepted during BBG1’s Phase 1 review. This means that none of the tracts receiving bids were determined to be nonviable as was the case for the 199 tracts that were improperly acquired for carbon disposal purposes in Sales 257, 259, and 261. (Unsurprisingly, neither of the acquiring companies has submitted an exploration plan for any of these CCS leases. The leases will likely expire without activity. Much to the dismay of the large and diverse group of opponents, the carbon disposal industry is focusing on onshore locations along the Gulf Coast.)

Meanwhile, a Cook Inlet lease sale is scheduled for March 4, and another Gulf of America sale will be held on March 11. Despite attractive terms, don’t expect either to be a banner “red jacket” lease sale. (See the John Rankin recognition below.)

More information on BOEM’s bid evaluation process.

Read Full Post »

It’s always interesting to compare the high bids with the “runner-up” bids on the same tracts. Usually the gap is large and, as indicated in the table below, that is the case with the Sale 261 “top 10.” This tells us that bidding is independent, that tract evaluation is far from an exact science, that information and expert opinions differ, and that companies have different business and bidding strategies.

Particularly interesting in this sale were the tracts that both Hess and Chevron, its future parent, sought to acquire. Chevron and Hess bid against each other on two of the “top 10” tracts, and Hess outbid Chevron by wide margins. Will this affect post-merger relationships? πŸ˜‰

In a future post, we’ll look at the 14 rejected Sale 259 high bids and the bidding on these tracts in Sale 261.

blockhigh bid
(million $)
company2nd highest bid
(million $)
company
MC 38925.5Anadarko1.9LLOG
GC 18821.0Hess4.8Chevron
GC 15118.0Hess3.0Anadarko
GC 72317.2Anadarko (55%)
Chevron (45%)
2.0Equinor
GC 11614.0Hess7.5Anadarko
GC 72212.0Equinor1.4Chevron (55%)
Anadarko (45%)
GC 727.5Hesssingle bidder
GC 2327.0Hess1.1Chevron
GB 7016.7Shellsingle bidder
KC 2105.3Shellsingle bidder

Read Full Post »