Posts Tagged ‘Coast Guard’
On Memorial Day weekend, I’m re-posting this 2010 BOE tribute to the Coast Guard
Posted in accidents, hurricanes, Offshore Energy - General, tagged Coast Guard, macondo, Memorial Day on May 28, 2022| Leave a Comment »
LA Times: “Permit problem stalls investigation into Huntington Beach oil spill”
Posted in accidents, California, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, tagged Amplify, Coast Guard, Huntington Beach, NTSB, pipeline spill on February 25, 2022| Leave a Comment »
This is inexcusable if true:
A federal investigation into the October oil spill that paved the Orange County coast has been stalled for several months as authorities await approval to cut, remove and analyze part of the ruptured pipeline.
LA Times
Coast Guard and National Transportation Safety Board investigators currently have to rely on video captured during underwater pipeline inspections. Without a more detailed forensic examination of the damage in a lab, investigators won’t know whether to continue with their original investigation or move the investigation in a new direction.
LA Times
It’s not good when bureaucratic processes stall an important investigation. Hopefully the responsible agencies will be sufficiently embarrassed to get the investigation moving.
More good news on the Huntington Beach pipeline spill
Posted in accidents, California, Offshore Energy - General, oil, pipelines, tagged Coast Guard, Huntington Beach, pipeline spill, spill response on October 27, 2021| Leave a Comment »
Due to water currents and a robust emergency clean-up effort, local beaches and ocean were re-opened on Oct. 11. By mid October, walking along the wide, sandy beaches there’s no sign of the spill as dolphins and surfers share the waves against a backdrop of cargo ships, oil rigs and the soft silhouette of Catalina Island.
Santa Cruz Sentinel
Further confirmation of the lower spill volume:
“Right now, there’s high confidence that the spill was approximately 24,696 gallons. The exact number won’t be able to be verified until the investigation has been completed. But there’s high confidence in that number,” Shaye said.
LCDR Shaye to the Sentinel
“Our world environment is very resilient, which is a positive thing,” Shaye said. “As far as the birds and wildlife; there have been some deaths, as happens in this kind of situation. But quite a few have been rehabilitated and released back into their environment.
LCDR Shaye to the Sentinel
Kudos to the responders. The training and response exercises worked!
Coast Guard revises Huntington Beach spill estimate downward
Posted in accidents, California, Offshore Energy - General, oil, tagged Amplify, Beta Unit, Coast Guard, Huntington Beach, pipeline spill on October 8, 2021| Leave a Comment »
As we have been suggesting for several days, the initial spill estimate was too conservative (high) and assumed near total losses from the pipeline. The Coast Guard has now established a “minimum” estimate which is identical to the spill volume cited in footnote 2 of the PHMSA Order. This estimate was presumably determined after a review of meter data.
Coast Guard Capt. Rebecca Ore said at a media briefing that officials “have assessed and verified pipeline data, and made a determination that the minimum amount of crude oil released from that pipeline is 588 barrels of oil,” which equals about 24,696 gallons.
OC Register
The Coast Guard is not backing off the original estimate entirely hedging that “it’s still possible the leak is of roughly the size that’s been reported.” Meanwhile, the mayor of Huntington Beach has expressed some optimism:
Asked whether the lower estimate of oil released could mean beaches reopen sooner, Huntington Beach Mayor Kim Carr said she was “cautiously optimistic that it will be sooner than later.”
OC Register
So OSHA will be implementing the vaccine mandate for businesses…
Posted in Health, Regulation, tagged Coast Guard, OCS, OSHA, vaccine mandate on September 10, 2021| Leave a Comment »
and they will presumably do so with an emergency final rule. This will be interesting. Over-under on the days until publication? Number of public comments?
And since the Coast Guard functions as OSHA on the Outer Continental Shelf, will they be enforcing the offshore industry’s compliance with this mandate? BSEE inspectors?
BSEE Offshore Incident Statistics
Posted in accidents, Gulf of Mexico, Offshore Energy - General, Regulation, tagged accidents, BSEE, Coast Guard, NASEM, safety culture on August 23, 2021| Leave a Comment »
Comprehensive and timely incident data are critical for risk assessments, preventing recurrences, training and safety management programs, assessing the performance of the industry and individual companies, and driving safety culture. The National Academies 2021 review of BSEE’s inspection program included a number of recommendations related to data management including this one:
Recommendation 2. To further its goal of increasing data transparency and facilitating its internal and external use, BSEE should invest in more advanced and creative data collection, analytic and visualization tools, and infrastructure; corresponding data management, analysis, and evaluation capabilities among its personnel; and an outward-facing, online data system that can be navigated with ease and kept current across all fields for the purpose of encouraging and facilitating safety analyses.
National Academies Report, 2021
Unfortunately, BSEE’s incident data are not updated and posted in a timely manner. As we approach September 2021, the 2020 incident statistics are still not publicly available. These incidents include at least one rig fatality that neither BSEE nor the Coast Guard announced at the time of occurrence one year ago today (8/23/2020) or subsequently. The only public information about this fatality is the following self-serving statement by the operator:
“This is a routine operation that was executed with no time pressure as the rig disconnection had been decided well in advance,” Total said.
Upstream
A 37-year old man died, but according to the operator there is nothing to see here. This is not the type of statement you would expect from a company with a leading safety culture.
The keystone of BSEE’s primary mission, protecting workers and the environment, is timely incident information that is regularly reviewed and updated. Continuous improvements in safety are dependent on continuous improvements in data management and analysis. BSEE can do much better, as can other regulators, the offshore industry, and those of us who are interested and concerned observers.
Kudos to the Coast Guard…
Posted in Gulf of Mexico, Health, Offshore Energy - General, tagged Coast Guard, Hoover Diana on August 21, 2021| Leave a Comment »
A Coast Guard MH-65 Dolphin helicopter crew from Air Station Houston, Texas, medevacs an oil rig crew member experiencing a cardiac event on the Hoover-Diana oil platform, 150 miles east of Corpus Christi, Texas, Aug. 19, 2021. The helicopter crew successfully transported the man to the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas, in stable condition. (U.S. Coast Guard video, courtesy Sector/Air Station Corpus Christi)
US Coast Guard
But what happened to industry medevac capabilities? Or is this simply a matter of Hoover-Diana’s isolation?
Standards: Will policy challenges surpass content challenges?
Posted in Regulation, tagged Coast Guard, Deepwater Horizon, drilling, macondo, Regulation, safety, standards, transocean on June 15, 2011| 2 Comments »
In their comments on the Coast Guard’s Deepwater Horizon Joint Investigation Team Report, Transocean made these statements about BOP maintenance standards incorporated in MMS drilling regulations:
By glossing over the contours of the regulatory language, the Draft Report unilaterally converts API Recommended Practice 53 from an advisory guideline into a mandatory requirement. Notwithstanding the Draft Report’s insistence otherwise, the API’s recommendation that the BOP “should” be disassembled and inspected according to the manufacturer’s guidelines is not mandatory. The API clarifies that the word “should” indicates a recommended practice for which a comparably safe alternative is available or which may be impractical or unnecessary in some conditions. In contrast, to denote a recommended practice that is “advisable in all circumstances,” the API uses the word “shall.” The API also emphasizes that “the formulation and publication of API standards is not intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices.” Though it recommends specific practices, API acknowledges that “equivalent alternative installations and practices may be utilized to accomplish the same objectives.” On its face, the language of API RP 53 makes clear that the recommendation that the BOP “should” be disassembled and inspected in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines is a recommendation, and nothing more.
Although the MMS regulations governing BOP maintenance incorporate API RP 53 sections 17.10 and 18.10 by reference, this does not convert the API’s recommendations into a mandatory requirement. As the MMS has clarified, “[t]he legal effect of incorporation by reference” is merely that “the material is treated as if it were published in the Federal Register.”
Treating API RP 53 as if it had been published in the Federal Register does not imbue its language with more regulatory significance than it had before. The API’s recommendations regarding BOP maintenance—as well as the API’s acknowledgement that alternative practices “may be utilized to accomplish the same objectives”—remain recommendations, not requirements. Transocean’s complete comments are posted on their website.
I’ll withhold my comments on the above statements, except to say that my opinion differs substantially from Transocean’s.
More significantly, these and other recent industry and government comments demonstrate the complexity of standards policy issues. How are standards most effectively applied by operators in formulating safety management programs, operating plans, and safety cases? Contractors? How should deviations from standards be assessed and documented? How should regulators use standards? To what extent should standards be incorporated into regulations? What is the appropriate role for regulators in standards development? These issues may prove to be more challenging than updating technical requirements. Stay tuned!
IADC Comments on Volume 1 (Coast Guard) of the Joint Investigation Team’s Deepwater Horizon Report
Posted in accidents, Offshore Energy - General, Regulation, tagged accidents, Coast Guard, Deepwater Horizon, IADC, macondo, Montara, Norway, offshore drilling, Regulation, safety on June 2, 2011| 2 Comments »
Like the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, the Montara Commission of Inquiry, the Norwegian government, and leading safety and regulatory authorities around the world, the IADC recognizes the risks associated with complex, multi-agency regulatory regimes. A single authority should be responsible and accountable for safety and pollution prevention at offshore facilities, and should draw on the expertise of other agencies and organizations as necessary to achieve performance objectives.
The safety and environmental risks associated with fragmented or compartmentalized regulation include gaps, overlap, confusion, inconsistencies, and conflicting standards. Industry and governmental personnel spend too much time coordinating with multiple parties and not enough time managing safety and environmental risks.
Link to IADC comments. Key quotes:
IADC continues to be concerned by seemingly duplicative regulatory requirements imposed by the Coast Guard and BOEMRE, particularly where the agencies appear to have divergent views regarding the placement of regulatory responsibility.
One cannot holistically address safety when faced with the unyielding and overlapping demands of multiple narrowly-focused regulatory agencies.


