Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Sable Offshore’

Comments from the California AG and Sable Offshore on the special permit application to PHMSA

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, tagged , , , , , , , on April 8, 2026| 2 Comments »

I’m attaching the complete comment letters from Sable Offshore and their main antagonist, California Attorney General Bonta, in response to PHMSA’s public notice and request for comments on Sable’s special permit application.

Summary of the California AG’s assertions:

“First, PHMSA is without authority to grant such a special permit because Lines CA-324/325 are intrastate pipelines and California regulators have sole regulatory oversight over any attempt to restart these Lines and issue state waivers. Second, California has vested interests in ensuring Lines CA-324/325 operate safely and PHMSA’s proposed special permit would dilute the higher state safety standards that were imposed on Sable and therefore it is inconsistent with pipeline safety. 49 C.F.R. § 190.341(d). Third, given the fact Line CA-324 already failed and caused a catastrophic oil spill in 2015 in Santa Barbara County, even if PHMSA had authority to issue a special permit (which it does not), a more robust environmental analysis needs to be performed. Fourth, PHMSA unlawfully invokes the Endangered Species Acts’s emergency consultation procedures and has given no indication that it will consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service, in violation of the Act. Finally, Secretary Wright’s March 13, 2026, order (“DPA
Order”) does not change anything about the propriety of the Application, because the DPA Order itself is unlawful.”

Summary of Sable’s position (screenshot):

You can sample the other public comments, some of which are quite good, by visiting the Regulations.gov docket.

PHMSA-2026-0464-0067_attachment_1Download
California Comment LetterDownload

Read Full Post »

Buckle up! Sable is selling SYU production!

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, tagged , , , , , on March 31, 2026| Leave a Comment »

Sable Offshore photo

Sable Offshore Corp. (3/30/2026) today announced that on March 29, 2026, Sable initiated oil sales. The Santa Ynez Pipeline System was filled from Las Flores Canyon to Pentland Station at a rate in excess of 50,000 barrels of oil per day.

At the Santa Ynez Unit, Platform Harmony is currently producing approximately 22,000 gross barrels of oil per day. Additionally, the United States Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement has completed its final pre-restart inspection of Platform Heritage. Sable plans to commence production restart at Platform Heritage today at an expected total rate of over 30,000 gross barrels of oil per day. We expect Platform Hondo to be online by the end of the second quarter of 2026 at a rate in excess of 10,000 barrels of oil per day.

Sable Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jim Flores, said “Sable is proud to announce oil sales through the Santa Ynez Pipeline System to Chevron. In doing so, we are providing American oil from American soil through an American pipeline to an American refinery for American consumers and the United States military.

A wild month in the 50 year Santa Ynez Unit saga is ending with a flourish. The wind is at Sable’s back, but storm clouds are on the horizon.

Read Full Post »

March Madness – will California’s full court press halt Sable’s momentum?

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, tagged , , , , , , , , on March 25, 2026| Leave a Comment »

On Monday, Sable got a boost from Judge Wilson, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Judge Wilson denied a request by the California Department of Parks and Recreation (and other State agencies) to enjoin Sable Offshore from restarting or continuing the operation of oil pipeline segments withing Gaviota State Park.

Sable got another boost from Chevron, which agreed to buy 20,000 bopd from Sable for its El Segundo refinery.

Not to be denied, the California Attorney General filed the attached lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The AG argues that US Energy Secretary Chris Wright has no authority under the Defense Production Act (DPA) to excuse Sable from compliance with state and federal laws and court orders. The lawsuit alleges that the DPA Order violates the Administrative Procedure Act and infringes on California’s sovereign power under the Tenth Amendment.

The suit also alleges that the Order violates the constitutional Separation of Powers by purporting to override not only state law and a preliminary injunction issued by the Santa Barbara Superior Court, but also a judicial Consent Decree approved by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California that expressly acknowledged and approved the State’s role in reviewing and approving any planned restart of the onshore pipelines.

The AG asks the Court (p. 33) to issue a judicial declaration that the Wright Order is unconstitutional and/or unlawful because it violates the APA and the U.S. Constitution.

Read the Court filing for full details, and stay tuned. No doubt there will be more swings in momentum going forward.

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive and Other Relief [1]Download

Read Full Post »

Two wild weeks for the Santa Ynez Unit

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, tagged , , , , , , , on March 17, 2026| Leave a Comment »

Add the unprecedented events of the last two weeks to the long and troubled history of the Santa Ynez Unit dating back to the Offshore Storage & Treatment facility days. There are no parallels in the history of the US OCS program.

To date in March:

3/3/2026: The Dept. of Justice issues an opinion asserting that, under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA), an order issued by the President or his delegee would preempt California laws currently impeding Sable from resuming production and operating the associated pipeline infrastructure.

3/13/2026: Secretary of Energy Chris Wright issues an order to Sable invoking the DPA to immediately prioritize and allocate pipeline transportation services for hydrocarbons from the SYU through the Santa Ynez Pipeline System (SYPS).

3/14/2026: A letter from California Parks and Recreation demands that Sable remove all four miles of its pipeline from Gaviota State Park.

3/14/2026: Sable resumes the transportation of Santa Ynez Unit oil through the SYPS from Las Flores Canyon (LFC) to Pentland Station. Prior to resuming hydrocarbon transportation from LFC to Sable’s sales point at Pentland Station, Sable had approximately 540,000 barrels of processed crude oil in storage at LFC, representing more than the line fill volume for the SYPS between LFC and Pentland Station.

3/16/2026: Sable resumes oil production at anticipated rate of 50,000 bopd and expects first sales by April 1, 2026. Production ramp-up is anticipated to proceed with full production resumption at Platforms Harmony and Heritage this month and Platform Hondo in June 2026

Read Full Post »

According to the WSJ, Sable has resumed the transport of SYU oil

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, Uncategorized, tagged , , , on March 16, 2026| Leave a Comment »

This follows the directive from Energy Secretary Chris Wright on Friday.

However, quoting Nick Welsh of the Santa Barbara Independent: “With Sable Offshore, one thing’s for certain; there’s always more to come.”

Read Full Post »

Friday Night Lights – Secretary Chris Wright directs Sable to resume SYU production!

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, tagged , , , , , , on March 13, 2026| Leave a Comment »

(Bloomberg) — The Trump administration on Friday took action to clear the way for oil production off the California coast in a bid to ease the global fuel pressures created by the war with Iran.

The announcement by Energy Secretary Chris Wright follows an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on Friday and directs Sable Offshore Corp., a Houston-based company, to begin restoring operations for the Santa Ynez Unit and Santa Ynez Pipeline System in California.

What about Judge Geck’s injunction and the case before the 9th Circuit? How are they affected by the EO and DOJ opinion?

Perhaps Four World Capital Management wasn’t crazy after all.

More Santa Ynez Unit posts.

Read Full Post »

Sable shares pop following DOJ opinion

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, Uncategorized, tagged , , , , on March 6, 2026| Leave a Comment »

Big move by SOC following the issuance of the DOJ opinion. Justified optimism or irrational exuberance?

Read Full Post »

Dept. of Justice opinion boosts prospects for Santa Ynez Unit production

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, tagged , , , , , , , , on March 6, 2026| Leave a Comment »

Attached is an opinion prepared by the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, for the General Counsel, Dept. of Energy. This opinion may boost prospects for Santa Ynez Unit (SYU) production, either by Sable Offshore or a successor.

BOE SYU watchers see this State-Federal battle ultimately ending up in the Supreme Court, perhaps following the 9th Circuit’s ruling on PHMSA’s preemption of State authority over the onshore pipeline segments.

A few key excerpts from the DOJ opinion (emphasis added):

p. 1: You have asked whether an order issued under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (“DPA” or “Act”), Pub. L. No. 81-774, 64 Stat. 798 (codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. § 4501 et seq.), to Sable by the President or his delegee would preempt the California laws currently impeding Sable from resuming production and operating the associated pipeline infrastructure. We conclude that it would.

p. 6: As the Supreme Court has explained, executive orders “may create rights protected against inconsistent state laws through the Supremacy Clause,” especially when such orders are issued pursuant to “congressional authorization.”

p. 20: State law, we have been advised, is not currently the only impediment to Sable’s ability to resume production and transportation of oil. A consent decree entered in United States v. Plains All American Pipeline L.P., No. 20-cv-02415 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2020), Dkt. 33 (“Consent Decree”), “currently vests authority over resumption of transportation through the onshore portions of the Santa Ynez Pipeline System with the California Office of the State Fire Marshal.” Sable Letter at 9. We have been advised that, in addition to the United States and various State of California entities, Sable is a party to the Consent decree as a result of an acquisition. You have asked whether an executive order under the DPA would displace these provisions of the Consent Decree, even though there are both federal- and state-law claims at issue in that case. For three reasons, we think it would.

2026-03-03-dpa-preemptionDownload

Read Full Post »

Losses mounting for Sable: $408 million in 2025 following $327 million in 2024

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, tagged , , , on March 5, 2026| Leave a Comment »

The potential rewards are great – 500+ million barrels of oil, 3 major production platforms, associated pipelines, onshore processing facilities – but can Sable survive the costly legal and administrative challenges? What is Exxon’s plan for the Santa Ynez Unit if Sable should fail?

Read Full Post »

Sable Offshore: go figure

Posted in California, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, pipelines, Regulation, tagged , , , , on March 2, 2026| Leave a Comment »

Judge Donna Geck upholds restraining order
large investment in Sable

On Friday, California Superior Court Judge Donna Geck upheld the restraining order that blocks Sable Offshore from restarting Santa Ynez Unit production. She scheduled a followup court hearing for June 27. Meanwhile, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal’s hearing on PHMSA’s assertion of Federal jurisdiction over the onshore pipeline segments is scheduled for July.

Can Sable survive financially until those hearings are concluded?

Contradictorily, we learn that FourWorld Capital Management just purchased 8 million shares of Sable. Is that the financial equivalent of Pickett’s Charge or does FourWorld have good reasons for their optimism?

Prior Sable Santa Ynez Unit posts.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »