Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘tract evaluation’

Tracts receiving bids in Sale BBG1

To date,BOEM has deemed 96 of the 181 BBG1 high bids to be acceptable. No high bids have been rejected. Although the sale was “beautiful but not big,” the bids were relatively strong on a per acre basis. The number of rejected bids may thus be quite low.

No bids were accepted during BBG1’s Phase 1 review. This means that none of the tracts receiving bids were determined to be nonviable as was the case for the 199 tracts that were improperly acquired for carbon disposal purposes in Sales 257, 259, and 261. (Unsurprisingly, neither of the acquiring companies has submitted an exploration plan for any of these CCS leases. The leases will likely expire without activity. Much to the dismay of the large and diverse group of opponents, the carbon disposal industry is focusing on onshore locations along the Gulf Coast.)

Meanwhile, a Cook Inlet lease sale is scheduled for March 4, and another Gulf of America sale will be held on March 11. Despite attractive terms, don’t expect either to be a banner “red jacket” lease sale. (See the John Rankin recognition below.)

More information on BOEM’s bid evaluation process.

Read Full Post »

It’s always interesting to compare the high bids with the “runner-up” bids on the same tracts.โ€‚Usually the gap is large and, as indicated in the table below, that is the case with the Sale 261 “top 10.” This tells us that bidding is independent, that tract evaluation is far from an exact science, that information and expert opinions differ, and that companies have different business and bidding strategies.

Particularly interesting in this sale were the tracts that both Hess and Chevron, its future parent, sought to acquire. Chevron and Hess bid against each other on two of the “top 10” tracts, and Hess outbid Chevron by wide margins. Will this affect post-merger relationships? ๐Ÿ˜‰

In a future post, we’ll look at the 14 rejected Sale 259 high bids and the bidding on these tracts in Sale 261.

blockhigh bid
(million $)
company2nd highest bid
(million $)
company
MC 38925.5Anadarko1.9LLOG
GC 18821.0Hess4.8Chevron
GC 15118.0Hess3.0Anadarko
GC 72317.2Anadarko (55%)
Chevron (45%)
2.0Equinor
GC 11614.0Hess7.5Anadarko
GC 72212.0Equinor1.4Chevron (55%)
Anadarko (45%)
GC 727.5Hesssingle bidder
GC 2327.0Hess1.1Chevron
GB 7016.7Shellsingle bidder
KC 2105.3Shellsingle bidder

Read Full Post »