Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘macondo’

While thunder-snow created a surreal setting outside, the scene was rather predictable inside as the National Commission co-chairs testified before the House Natural Resource Committee.  Members acknowledged the Commission’s service, questioned qualifications, expressed frustration with the “permitorium,” raised concerns about our economic and energy future, and disputed the conclusion that “systemic industry failures” contributed to the disaster.  Others suggested that Macondo safety issues had not been resolved, that the risks associated with offshore drilling were not being managed properly, and that everyone else in the world regulates offshore operations more effectively than the US (or at least their disasters have been less recent).

Putting all that aside, I was pleased by the interest of the members in the BOP failure. They seem to share our frustration with the delays in the BOP examination/testing/forensics/autopsy. Perhaps the Committee can determine the status of this very important aspect of the investigation, and provide a summary of what has happened since the stack was recovered and what work remains to be accomplished. That would seem to be a reasonable request.

Read Full Post »

Good news first:

Scientists at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts found circumstantial evidence that the chemicals guided some oil into underwater currents, stopping it from bubbling up to the surface, where it would do more damage, said marine chemist Elizabeth Kujawinski.

Now the bad:

But she added, “the dispersant is sticking around,” which is worrisome. The chemicals didn’t seem to biodegrade the oil and gas as fast as basic chemistry would predict.

See the AP article recommended by BOE oil spill guru Cheryl Anderson.

Read Full Post »

Bob Graham and William Reilly will testify.

Schedule (Eastern Time):

0930 – Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee – live streaming

1400 – House Natural Resources Committee – broadcast live on C-SPAN3

The questioning should be pretty lively, especially at the House hearing.

Read Full Post »

One of the better paragraphs I have read since Macondo:

The Deepwater story shows the fight against complacency is a continuous struggle, not a single battle. An executive at another oil major told me the default setting for safety managers should be “chronic unease”. That’s easy to see if you’re a prison governor or lighthouse-keeper. But it should be part of any executive’s attitude. Constant vigilance against, say, new competition, supply chain disruption, or unforeseen technological change is a must for modern managers.

Read Full Post »

No government regulatory structure alone can guarantee safety in an industry that must constantly adapt new technology to natural variations in drilling sites and unexpected natural phenomena. Oversight must improve, as the Obama administration has made clear, but also every company involved in oil drilling – not just BP – must individually and in concert with others evaluate industry standards and safety research programs. And none should assume that BP’s mistakes could not occur elsewhere. Washington Post

Well said!

Read Full Post »

In the Wall Street Journal, Rex Tillerson says that the Macondo blowout was not caused by systemic problems within the industry:

The explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig, resulting in the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, was caused by its operators’ decisions and not by general problems in the oil industry, Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Rex Tillerson said Thursday.

But then seems to contradict that statement:

“It’s really up to the industry” to make sure regulation is strong and disasters like these don’t happen again, he said.

So, isn’t the second quote acknowledging a systemic problem?

Read Full Post »

Wall Street Journal

The conclusions of the presidential commission’s inquiry into the causes of the Deepwater Horizon accident published Thursday make it increasingly likely that BP will not be found grossly negligent and will avoid the harshest financial penalties for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Pre-trial orders

Siding with arguments by the Plaintiffs, Judge Barbier concluded that the depositions should go forward in New Orleans, rather than in Houston as preferred by BP.

BP vs. TO vs. Halliburton (quotes from New York Times article)

In a statement on Wednesday, BP noted that the commission had found fault with a number of companies, not only BP, the main owner of the well.

Halliburton said in a statement that it had acted at BP’s direction in preparing and injecting cement into the well. It said tests the panel identified as indicating problems with its cement formula were preliminary and did not contribute to the disaster. Halliburton also criticized the commission for what it called selective omissions of exculpatory material it gave to the panel’s staff.

A spokesman for Transocean said that BP, not Transocean, made the major decisions in the hours before the blowout. “Based on the limited information made available to them, the Transocean crew took appropriate actions to gain control of the well,” the spokesman said. “They were well trained and considered to be among the best in the business.”

Read Full Post »

Link to the full report

What?

The blowout in the Gulf of Mexico could have been prevented if the last-line of defence—the blind shear ram on the blowout preventer, located at the well head on the ocean floor—had activated and crushed the drill pipe. Given the importance of this equipment, and the evident dangers of relying on a single device, we urge the HSE to consider prescribing specifically that blowout preventers on the UK Continental Shelf should have two blind shear rams.

Comments:

  1. The UK government should NOT be commenting on the BOP failure until the US government has completed its forensic testing and investigation.
  2. The Committee has apparently not paid any attention to the testimony on the BOP issues or the other BOP information that has surfaced.  Have they not seen the comments from BP and Transocean or the videos shot on the Q4000?
  3. Would it have been appropriate for the US government to publish a report on Piper Alpha before Lord Cullen had completed his review?

Read Full Post »

click on table to enlarge

Click for the chapter on the causes of the blowout

Read Full Post »

The UK Energy and Climate Change Committee has released its report entitled “UK Deepwater Drilling – Implications of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.” We’ll post the report as we get a link.

Here’s the gist:

A moratorium on oil drilling in deep waters off Britain would undermine the country’s energy security, according to a report by lawmakers published on Thursday in response to the BP spill disaster last year.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »