Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Atlantic Shores’

Unlike offshore oil and gas projects, where State and local govt are usually of one mind (pro or con), States and localities have disagreed sharply about offshore wind. This is particularly true in New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland, where the State governments are wind advocates despite strong local opposition.

As a result of litigation filed by local entities, and with the acceptance of the Courts, the US Dept. of the Interior is reconsidering Construction & Operations Plan (COP) approvals for the SouthCoast Wind project offshore Massachusetts and Rhode Island, the Atlantic Shores project offshore New Jersey, and US Wind’s Maryland Offshore Wind (“MarWin”) project. These COPs were approved at the end of the previous Administration. Most notably, the SouthCoast Wind COP was approved on 1/17/2025, just three days before the inauguration.

With regard to the US Wind MarWin project, there is a new twist in that the Delaware Environmental Appeals Board unanimously agreed to hear challenges to the State’s CZMA consistency decisions. The complete appeal file is attached.

The criticism of US Wind’s failure to address the risks of turbine blade failures and emergency response plans (p. 10) is warranted given the unacceptably high rate of such failures, the 2024 Vineyard Wind failure (still no investigation report!), and last month’s troubling blade failure at the He Dreiht wind farm offshore Germany (photo below).

Photo: Bundespolizeiinspektion See Cuxhaven

Read Full Post »

In February, EPA Region 2 asked the agency’s Environmental Appeals Board to remand Atlantic Shores’ air emissions permit back to the Region for reconsideration. That remand (attached) was granted on 14 March over the objections of Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind.

Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind still exists despite the exit of 50% partner Shell and a $940 million write down by the remaining owner EDF. The diagram depicts Atlantic Shores South (0499) and North (0549) lease areas.

EDF intends “to preserve the company and its future development.” Whether or not they can hold the leases indefinitely without pursuing development remains to be seen. BOEM’s diligence regulations for offshore wind projects are vague, and neither the Construction and Operations Plans nor BOEM’s Record of Decision (Atlantic Shores South) include work schedules.

Does EDF have the right to sit on the lease until the financial and regulatory environment is attractive? That is not allowed for oil and gas leases, and rightfully so. (See a related post on Total’s wind lease.)

Meanwhile, ACK for Whales has petitioned EPA Region 1 to reopen and reanalyze the air permits for permits for the New England Wind 1 and 2 projects asserting that:

  • The analysis does account for emissions related to and resulting from blade failures, which would warrant emergency repairs or replacement activities.
  • The decision to group Vineyard Wind 1, New England Wind 1 and New England Wind 2, as a single stationary source is both legally questionable and could have the effect of masking localized emission spikes.
  • Insufficient consideration of cumulative vessel emissions could lead to 1-hour NO₂ exceedances.
  • The emissions from pile driving are not adequately modeled in isolation or synergistically.

Read Full Post »

Not a single offshore wind turbine will be installed offshore New Jersey during the reign of Gov. Murphy, a leading proponent of offshore wind. How much did his wind advocacy cost NJ taxpayers?

Meanwhile, management of what is left of the Atlantic Shores partnership continues to deny the obvious – that there is no realistic path forward for their projects.

Finally, NJ Congressman Chris Smith is questioning any further action by BOEM on offshore wind projects. See the attached letter.

Read Full Post »