Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘HSE’

Encouraging report from Steve Walker and his HSE colleagues.

Figures from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) show that there were 73 major or significant hydrocarbon releases associated with offshore installations in 2010/11, compared with 85 the previous year. There were 61 recorded in 2008/09 – the lowest since HSE began regulating the industry. Overall, there continues to be a downward trend in the total of all reported hydrocarbon releases offshore.

For the fourth year running, no workers were killed during offshore activities regulated by HSE and 2010/11 also saw a fall in the number of major injuries. There were 42 reported compared with 50 the previous year, bringing the total in line with the average of the previous five years.

Read Full Post »

The HSE has told Shell to submit a revised safety case for the Brent Charlie platform after gas was detected on its topsides following leaks on 12 January this year and 27 September 2010, Upstream can reveal.

Shell, which took the decision itself to close the platform after the January incident, has been battling for some time to resolve technically complex issues related to the venting of gas from inside one the platform’s huge concrete legs — Column 1 (C1) — and dispersing it effectively away from the platform.

The operator now expects the ageing Brent field to remain shut down for several more months.

Read Full Post »

BOE applauds retired offshore regulators Ian Whewell (UK HSE) and John Clegg (NOPSA Australia) for their excellent participation in yesterday’s hearings. No one is wiser than a retired regulator. 😉

Also, Magne Ognedal overcame technical glitches to make an important long-distance contribution from Norway.  Those who have not yet read our interview with Magne should take the time to do so.  In this interview, which was conducted before Macondo, Magne concisely answers most of the questions about the Norwegian regime and regulatory philosophy that have arisen since the blowout.

Read Full Post »

Firstly, major kudos to the Canadians for organizing a great conference in Vancouver, a wonderful city.  The Newfoundland-Labrador and Nova Scotia Petroleum Boards, and the National Energy Board were outstanding hosts, and Max, Howard, Stuart, Sean, Bharat, and the folks at Venue West did a great job with the arrangements. The International Regulators’ Offshore Safety Conference was a huge success thanks to their efforts.

The international leaders in Vancouver were in full agreement that the key to long term safety achievement is the strength and vitality of the safety culture in the operating companies, contractors, and regulatory organizations.  How is such a culture encouraged and achieved?  As NOPSA CEO Jane Cutler has said “safety culture is what you do when no one is watching.”  Inspections are a necessary regulatory tool, but if they are too frequent they send the message that the government is responsible for safety, and that operators and workers can relax their guard.  As Magne Ognedal (PSA-Norway) has frequently said, safety must be managed by the “owner” of the facility and the risk, with the government holding the owner accountable and insisting on excellence.

Steve Walker, UK HSE chief, said that regulators must encourage a “beyond compliance” culture and serve as catalysts for learning and achievement. Regulators can never be satisfied; they should be negative thinkers searching for the operations, processes, and behaviors that might trigger the next major accident.  Dr. Mark Fleming from St. Mary’s University in Halifax believes that safety culture can in fact be regulated, not in the traditional sense, but by requiring companies to have systems in place for promoting and measuring the organizational culture.

Regulators must also look at their own safety culture.  Are they focused solely on compliance and “command and control,” or are they investigating risks, assessing management programs, and evaluating performance?  Are regulatory employees free to investigate and inquire, or are they mere implementers of management directives?  Are employees rewarded for sustaining the hierarchy or challenging  the status quo?  Are they expected to explain why accidents can’t happen again or figure out how they can?

Much more on these and other Vancouver topics in the near future.

Read Full Post »

Courtesy of Upstream:

UK Workers Accuse Transocean of Bullying and Intimidation.

Union Calls for Shutdown of the P-31, 33, and 35 Floating Production Facilities offshore Brazil.

Read Full Post »