Conceptually, this technologically advanced polymetallic nodules collection system looks great. The big challenge that John Smith sees is with the number of moving parts. The numerous manipulators operating at such depths could be prone to breakdowns which reduce recovery rates and significantly increase operating costs.
Posts Tagged ‘polymetallic nodules’
Eureka polymetallic metals collection system
Posted in deep sea mining, energy policy, tagged deepsea minerals, Eureka Collection System, Impossible Metals, John B Smith, polymetallic nodules on November 17, 2025| 1 Comment »
Time to move ahead with responsible deep sea mining (i.e. nodule gathering)
Posted in deep sea mining, energy policy, tagged deep sea mining, land vs. deep sea impacts, Mars Lewis, monitoring, oversight, polymetallic nodules on May 12, 2025| Leave a Comment »

One nodule contains high grades of four key metals, meaning that four times less ore needs to be processed to obtain the same amount of metal. Nodules also contain no toxic levels of heavy elements, and the entirety of a nodule can be used, making near-zero-solid-waste production possible. Because nodules sit unattached on top of the seafloor, they will not require drilling or blasting for retrieval.
It’s time to move ahead with deep sea mining in both international and US territorial waters. As we did for frontier exploratory oil and gas drilling in Alaska and the Atlantic, I recommend comprehensive oversight including full time onboard inspectors during the initial operations and a carefully designed environmental monitoring program.
This deep sea mining commentary by Mars Lewis was brought to my attention by John Smith. Good read:
🇺🇸🚢 ⛏️ We’re witnessing a wave of glorified pseudoscience and fantasy activism around the ocean floor—this idea that the deep sea is some mystical sanctuary of life and that any attempt to extract resources from it is an unforgivable sin against Gaia. Spare me.
The bottom of the ocean is not the Garden of Eden. It’s a black, silent, high-pressure wasteland—largely lifeless, uninhabitable, and filled with the very minerals we need to break free from Chinese supply chain domination. You want a clean energy future? Then stop whining about the only scalable path to get there.
China has already begun strip-mining the ocean floor without asking for your permission. They don’t care about the blobfish or the bacteria colonies around volcanic vents. They care about winning. And every time we moralize ourselves into inaction, we gift them another geopolitical advantage wrapped in Western guilt.
Let’s cut the delusion. There is no future where America stays on top without securing its own critical minerals. Recycling won’t save us. Wind and solar need metals. Batteries need rare earths. Data centers need semiconductors. And semiconductors need the materials sitting at the bottom of the ocean.
You don’t get to demand green tech, reject land mining, block seabed access, and still pretend you’re “saving the planet.” That’s not leadership. That’s learned helplessness.
So yes, I support Trump’s executive action. Because someone has to make the grown-up decision. Either we lead this resource race with responsibility and strength—or we watch tyrants carve up the planet while we post crying-face emojis and argue about what’s sacred 10,000 feet below sea level.
Let the race for the bottom begin. 🇺🇸🚢
Deep sea vs. land mining:

Deep sea mining update
Posted in deep sea mining, energy policy, Offshore Energy - General, tagged deep sea mining, Lisa Murkowski, NDAA, NORI, Norway, Norwegian Offshore Directorate, polymetallic nodules, TMC on January 16, 2024| Leave a Comment »


- 11/16/2023: Senator Murkowski reintroduces resolution calling for the US Senate to ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
- 11/21/2023: Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (NORI) shares data from their 2022 test mining on the impacts of seafloor sediment plumes. See the informative video embedded below.
- 12/7/2023: 31 members of congress send letter to Secretary Austin (attached) regarding the importance of deep-sea polymetallic nodules from a national security standpoint.
- 12/28/2023: NORI completes research campaign in the Pacific.
- 1/3/2024: National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is signed into law, and includes provisions directing the Department of Defense to submit a report to the House Armed Services Committee assessing the domestic processing of seafloor polymetallic nodules by March 1, 2024. See text pasted below.
- 1/9/2024: The Storting (Norwegian parliament) endorses the Government’s proposal to open parts of the Norwegian continental shelf for exploration for and production of seabed minerals. (Of interest to long-time offshore energy observers, the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) changed its name to the Norwegian Offshore Directorate (NOD) effective 1/1/2024. Fortunately, the serpent logo, my favorite offshore agency logo, has been retained!)
- 1/11/2024: The Wall Street Journal reports on growing US political support for deep sea mining.
“the committee directs the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy shall, by March 1, 2024, submit a report to the House Armed Services Committee assessing the processing of seabed resources of polymetallic nodules domestically. The report shall include, at a minimum, the following:
NDAA, p. 230
(1) a review of current resources and controlling parties in securing seabed resources of polymetallic nodules;
(2) an assessment of current domestic deep-sea mining and material processing capabilities; and
(3) a roadmap recommending how the United States can have the ability to source and/or process critical minerals in innovative arenas, such as deep-sea mining, to decrease reliance on sources from foreign adversaries and bolster domestic competencies.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (17)
- November 2025 (26)
- October 2025 (30)
- September 2025 (29)
- August 2025 (29)
- July 2025 (27)
- June 2025 (25)
- May 2025 (46)
- April 2025 (39)
- March 2025 (28)
- February 2025 (34)
- January 2025 (34)
- December 2024 (30)
- November 2024 (25)
- October 2024 (34)
- September 2024 (32)
- August 2024 (29)
- July 2024 (32)
- June 2024 (20)
- May 2024 (25)
- April 2024 (25)
- March 2024 (24)
- February 2024 (27)
- January 2024 (29)
- December 2023 (27)
- November 2023 (32)
- October 2023 (32)
- September 2023 (30)
- August 2023 (31)
- July 2023 (22)
- June 2023 (27)
- May 2023 (28)
- April 2023 (29)
- March 2023 (36)
- February 2023 (26)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (39)
- November 2022 (30)
- October 2022 (28)
- September 2022 (39)
- August 2022 (37)
- July 2022 (33)
- June 2022 (40)
- May 2022 (39)
- April 2022 (28)
- March 2022 (38)
- February 2022 (29)
- January 2022 (28)
- December 2021 (25)
- November 2021 (33)
- October 2021 (32)
- September 2021 (32)
- August 2021 (23)
- July 2021 (4)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (25)
- June 2011 (18)
- May 2011 (41)
- April 2011 (22)
- March 2011 (60)
- February 2011 (46)
- January 2011 (46)
- December 2010 (24)
- November 2010 (50)
- October 2010 (40)
- September 2010 (53)
- August 2010 (50)
- July 2010 (48)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (40)
- April 2010 (49)
- March 2010 (17)
- February 2010 (13)
-
Categories
- accidents (661)
- well control incidents (332)
- Alaska (34)
- Australia (14)
- NOPSEMA (6)
- Bahamas (2)
- Barbados (3)
- California (178)
- Canada (40)
- CCS (48)
- climate (187)
- conferences (36)
- cuba (23)
- decommissioning (115)
- deep sea mining (13)
- drilling (152)
- energy (75)
- energy policy (716)
- flaring and venting (13)
- Florida (9)
- Georges Bank (7)
- Gulf of Mexico (559)
- Guyana (50)
- Health (13)
- hurricanes (59)
- Interviews (4)
- IRF (14)
- Jamaica (17)
- Mexico (13)
- natural gas (72)
- NOPSEMA (2)
- Norway (79)
- offshore (32)
- Offshore Energy – General (1,114)
- oil spill response (25)
- pipelines (121)
- Regulation (300)
- rigs-to-reefs (27)
- Russia (26)
- seeps (8)
- UK (72)
- Uncategorized (432)
- Wind Energy (243)
- Offshore Wind (218)
- accidents (661)
-
Pages