<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://budsoffshoreenergy.com/2026/07/31/bp-atlantis-in-the-news-for-major-expansion-allegations-from-17-years-ago-proved-to-be-unjust/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Bud&#039;s Offshore Energy (BOE)</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-07-31T10:00:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>BP Atlantis in the news for major expansion; allegations from 17 years ago proved to be unjust</news:title><news:keywords>bp, BOEMRE, Atlantis, False Claims Act, expansion project</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://budsoffshoreenergy.com/2026/07/30/does-the-scotus-flowers-foods-v-brock-decision-reinforce-the-doj-opinion-that-sables-onshore-pipeline-segments-are-interstate/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Bud&#039;s Offshore Energy (BOE)</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-07-30T10:00:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Does the SCOTUS &#8220;Flowers Foods v. Brock&#8221; decision reinforce the DoJ opinion that Sable&#8217;s onshore pipeline segments are interstate?</news:title><news:keywords>DOJ, Sable Offshore, Santa Ynez Unit, SCOTUS, pipeline, pipeline jurisdiction, NInth Circuit, Flowers Foods</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
